The public call for police to back off of proactive policing ("deterring
criminal activity by showing police presence and engaging the public to
learn their concerns") is understandable after Ferguson and other
incidents of police brutality. The policy was designed to help stop
crime before it happens, and since its genesis in the 1990s, it seems to
have worked in many cities. But sometimes it works "too well," as
recent police shootings suggest.
The problem with most sudden shifts in policy is that we fail to
consider how we'll handle all the potential consequences. In this case,
some evidence suggests that police are being pressured to step away from
proactive policing, which in turn is emboldening some criminals.
This piece by Heather MacDonald outlines the evidence. I found it overly strident as she battles liberals and an article in
The Atlantic
that argued, "Fears of 'a new nationwide crime wave' are premature at
best and wildly misleading at worst." Still, her substantive arguments
give one pause. I suspect this is one of those issues in which we must
listen carefully to both sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment